کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5921149 | 1164869 | 2015 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

- LV-EF significantly improves after recanalization of true CTO.
- LV-EF improvement is more pronounced in patients with reduced baseline LV-EF.
- Segmental wall thickening (SWT) significantly increased in CTO segments.
- SWT improvement is more pronounced in dysfunctional CTO segments at baseline.
- SWT significantly increased in segments of non-CTO vessels.
BackgroundSuccessful recanalization of true chronic total occlusion (CTO) has been linked to a decrease in cardiac mortality. We evaluated the effect of CTO recanalization on LVEF and regional wall motion using paired cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) studies.Methods and results43 patients underwent contrast enhanced cMRI prior to and 9 months after successful recanalization of a true CTO defined as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow 0 and duration of occlusion of more than 3 months. Regional wall motion was analyzed using the AHA model. For each segment the wall thickness (WT) was measured over the duration of one heart cycle and segmental wall thickening (SWT) was calculated. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and volumes were measured. LVEF significantly increased by 2.4 ± 6.0% (p = 0.01). The increase was confined to patients with baseline LVEF below the median of 49.3% (4.1 ± 7.0%, p = 0.01) compared to 0.6 ± 4.0 (p = 0.48) in patients with baseline LVEF higher than the median. Segmental wall motion analysis was performed in 706 myocardial segments. SWT significantly increased in segments within the perfusion territory of the CTO vessel (5.1 ± 30.4%, p = 0.01), especially in dysfunctional segments at baseline with SWTinit < 45% (13.3 ± 24.3%, p < 0.001). In addition, SWT significantly increased in segments of non-CTO vessels (4.1 ± 32.1%, p < 0.01).ConclusionsIn conclusion, in patients with successful recanalization of CTO left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion are significantly improved, especially in patients with decreased LVEF and in dysfunctional segments.
Journal: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine - Volume 16, Issue 4, June 2015, Pages 228-232