کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6295949 | 1617207 | 2015 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- Fish recruitment forecast is crucial for fisheries management; however, data is sparse and difficult to gather.
- A series of machine learning methods are presented and compared.
- A series of performance metrics and statistical validation methods are presented and used.
- Probabilistic classification methods are shown to be adequate to deal with the uncertainty at forecasting fish recruitment.
- In particular, the flexible naive Bayes is used and tested on real-world data for fisheries management purposes.
The effect of different factors (spawning biomass, environmental conditions) on recruitment is a subject of great importance in the management of fisheries, recovery plans and scenario exploration. In this study, recently proposed supervised classification techniques, tested by the machine-learning community, are applied to forecast the recruitment of seven fish species of North East Atlantic (anchovy, sardine, mackerel, horse mackerel, hake, blue whiting and albacore), using spawning, environmental and climatic data. In addition, the use of the probabilistic flexible naive Bayes classifier (FNBC) is proposed as modelling approach in order to reduce uncertainty for fisheries management purposes. Those improvements aim is to improve probability estimations of each possible outcome (low, medium and high recruitment) based in kernel density estimation, which is crucial for informed management decision making with high uncertainty. Finally, a comparison between goodness-of-fit and generalization power is provided, in order to assess the reliability of the final forecasting models. It is found that in most cases the proposed methodology provides useful information for management whereas the case of horse mackerel is an example of the limitations of the approach. The proposed improvements allow for a better probabilistic estimation of the different scenarios, i.e. to reduce the uncertainty in the provided forecasts.
Journal: Ecological Informatics - Volume 25, January 2015, Pages 35-42