Examining the physiological plasticity of particle capture by the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis (L.): Confounding factors and potential artifacts with studies utilizing natural seston

Historically, particle capture efficiency (CE) in suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs has been shown to be strongly dependent on particle size, increasing asymptotically to a maximum of about 100% for particles ca. ≥ 4 μm in diameter. Recent advances in the analysis of the particulate matter of seston have allowed for more precise studies of bivalve feeding under natural conditions. Some studies have reported that the mechanisms associated with particle capture exhibit physiological plasticity, and under certain conditions smaller cells and particles are captured in preference to larger ones. For bivalves, however, there is no mechanistic explanation that would account for such fine-scale control of CE based on size. The current study experimentally assessed the seasonal control of CE by the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis, employing a flow-through system to examine particle capture of natural seston. The natural particle field was analyzed using two different types of particle analyzers, the LISST-100X and the Coulter Multisizer IIe. Mussels were simultaneously delivered synthetic microspheres of defined diameter (2-45 μm) to control for the effects of seasonal differences in the size and shape of natural particles. The capture of microspheres was quantified by means of flow cytometry (FCM), and results cross-checked with the Multisizer. Additionally, gene expression of a mucosal lectin (MeML) associated with the feeding organs of mussels was examined as a biomarker for physiological response to seasonal changes in the particle-food supply. Results demonstrated that for microspheres ≥ 4 μm CE of mussels was always near 100%, and did not change seasonally. In contrast, there was an apparent seasonal shift in CE of natural particles, with particles 17-to-35 μm in equivalent spherical diameter (ESD) occasionally being captured at lower efficiencies than particles 4-to-15 μm in ESD (e.g., during September and December). No relationship between MeML expression and seasonal CE was found. These findings call into question the physiological plasticity of CE in mussels and alternative hypotheses are presented. We suggest that the purported changes in CE are not a consequence of behavioral or physiological responses of mussels, but rather a result of one or more of the following confounding factors; 1) instrument artifacts that can arise as a result of the way in which laser and electronic particle counters calculate ESD to estimate particle size; 2) disaggregation of flocculent material collected from control chambers; 3) post-capture escape of highly motile phytoplankton cells from the infrabranchial camber; 4) qualitative factors of the particles that could affect capture; or 5) mathematical happenstance of calculating CE on particle-size classes that contain widely different numbers of particles.