کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
6694141 | 501918 | 2013 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Economics of centralized and decentralized compressed air energy storage for enhanced grid integration of wind power
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
اقتصاد ذخیره انرژی فشرده شده فشرده شده متمرکز و غیر متمرکز برای تقویت شبکه برق بادی
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
مهندسی انرژی
مهندسی انرژی و فناوری های برق
چکیده انگلیسی
In this paper we model the economic feasibility of compressed air energy storage (CAES) to improve wind power integration by means of a profit-maximizing algorithm. The Base Case is a wind park with 100Â MW of installed capacity and no storage facility. In Variant 1 we add a central CAES system with 90Â MW of compressor and 180Â MW of generation capacity. The compressed air is stored in a cavern. The CAES system is operated independently of the wind park such that profits from peak power sales on the spot market and the reserve power market are maximized. Variant 2 is an integrated, decentralized CAES system, where each wind turbine is equipped with a compressor but no generator. The compressed air is stored in a cavern and converted into electricity by a turbine, again maximizing profit as a peak power plant. Both variants are modeled for conventional diabatic and the more advanced adiabatic systems. We find that the economics of the systems studied depend on how intensively the spot market and the market for minute reserve are used. Unless a minute reserve market exists, where hourly contracts can be traded, none of the CAES power plants studied is economically feasible. CAES plants can be operated economically if combined trade in the spot market and the minute market is enabled, and provided that some support scheme is in place (e.g., such as the German Renewable Energies Act). A centralized CAES plant is found to be more attractive than a wind power plant with integrated CAES, irrespective of whether a feed-in tariff scheme also exists for the integrated plants. Diabatic CAES turns out to be more profitable than adiabatic CAES.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Applied Energy - Volume 101, January 2013, Pages 299-309
Journal: Applied Energy - Volume 101, January 2013, Pages 299-309
نویسندگان
Reinhard Madlener, Jochen Latz,