Evaluation of flowmeters for heat metering

Heat flowmeters are expected to be reasonably priced, be very reliable, and have high measurement accuracy. Various types of heat flowmeters have been developed and they are widely used in large residential and industrial buildings. In this study, three types of heat flowmeters (turbine, electromagnetic and ultrasonic) were tested for accuracy, effect of installation position and vibration, durability and performance in the field for several installation positions and in the presence of vibration. We used a liquid flow standard system and a customized durability test system in accordance with the International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML) R 75-2 heat meter testing method. The field test was conducted in eight different locations from winter to summer. All flowmeters were calibrated before and after the field test, and the measurement deviation and the relative expanded uncertainty were calculated. The mean deviations obtained were–0.21%,–0.07%, and 0.11%, with the relative expanded uncertainties 0.48%, 0.17%, and 0.40% for turbine, electromagnetic, and ultrasonic flowmeters, respectively. The results of position and rotation tests, mean deviations by rotation angles at 90°, 180°and 270°relative to 0°(horizontal position) were–1.24%,–1.07% and–0.80%, respectively. For the vibration tests at 1 m/s2 and 5 m/s2 vibration acceleration, the turbine flowmeter, the electromagnetic flowmeter and the ultrasonic flowmeter showed deviations that ranged from −0.2% to −0.5%, −0.6% (2.6 m3/h), and 0.0% (negligible), respectively. In the durability tests, the accuracy of all three types of heat flowmeters remained at ±1% or less, showing sufficient durability. In the field test, the deviation of the turbine flowmeter and the ultrasonic flowmeter showed ±2.5% or less deviation. However, the electromagnetic flowmeter seems to be inaccurate below 6.9% of the maximum flow rate.

► The calibration results show that electromagnetic and ultrasonic flowmeters are somewhat better than the turbine flowmeter.
► Electromagnetic and ultrasonic flowmeters were not affected by rotation.
► The ultrasonic flowmeter was not influenced by external vibration.
► The electromagnetic flowmeter seems to be inaccurate below 6.9% of the mean percent flow rate.