Comparison between three measurement methods for characterizing the charge state of granular insulating materials

Surface potential decay method has been frequently used to characterize the charge state of insulating materials. The present paper aims at a critical evaluation of this method when used for the characterization of granular plastics, by comparing it with the electric field monitoring by means of non-contact vibrating probes, and with the measurement of the charge induced in a capacitive probe connected to a Coulomb-meter. The experiments were performed on corona-charged polyethylene, polycarbonate, polyamide, and acetyl – butadiene – styrene granular materials. The experimental results show that surface potential decays faster than the electric field or the charge measured with the capacitive probe. The dimensions of the probes and the capacitive coupling between them and the samples, may explain this difference. Part of the potential decay measured by the smaller-size probe of the electrostatic voltmeter is due to the surface conduction, while the measurements made with the larger-size electric field and capacitive probes are less affected by this phenomenon.

► Surface potential and electric field: related to charge state of granular plastics.
► Aim: compare surface potential, electric field and charge measurements.
► Experiments on corona-charged polyethylene, polycarbonate, polyamide and ABS granules.
► Surface potential decays faster than electric field or charge.
► Explanations of faster decay: probes’ dimensions and probe-sample capacitive coupling.