Mimesis and mimicry in language - Creativity and aesthetics as the performance of (dis-)semblances1

This paper approaches creativity from the perspective of an everyday, decolonial-postcolonial aesthetics. While creativity emphasizes human agency, improvisation and, more broadly, the process of 'bringing novelty into the world' (Bhabha, 1994), aesthetics is about the perception and experience of creative acts and products (Dewey, 1934; Saito, 2015). Core concepts in the discussion are mimesis (re-presentation) and mimicry (disruptive imitation), which refer to a conceptual space similar to that captured by recontextualization (Bauman and Briggs, 1990) and iteration (Derrida, 1988). Importantly, mimesis/mimicry draw our attention to iconic and indexical signs and the experientiality of perception. These theoretical reflections are developed further with reference to digital writing in South Africa: (a) the recontextualization of Futurist writing as an example of mimicry and decolonization, and (b) mimesis as creative and experiential re-presentation in the articulation of emotion.