کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
754169 | 1462403 | 2016 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Human echolocation – important to avoid overlap of echo with next emitted sound.
• Acoustic gaze – as for animal echolocation, likely also in human echolocation.
• Continuous noise, at some conditions, gives higher echolocation detection than short bursts.
• Blind persons should not emit too tightly spaced bursts in a time interval when echolocating.
This study explored the ability of blind and sighted listeners to detect reflections, “echoes”, of burst trains or continuous noise. Echo detection was compared by presenting 5 ms bursts, rates from 1 to 64 bursts, with a continuous white noise, all during 500 ms. Sounds were recorded in an ordinary room through an artificial binaural head, the loudspeaker 1 m behind it. The reflecting object was an aluminum disk, diameter 0.5 m, placed at 1 m. The sounds were presented to 12 blind and 26 sighted participants in a laboratory using a 2-Alternative-Forced-Choice methodology. The task was to detect which of two sounds contained an echo. In Experiment 2, 1.5 m distance sounds were presented to the blind only. At 1 m, detection for the blind increased up to 64 bursts/500 ms, but for the sighted up to 32 bursts. At 1.5 m, the peak performance for the blind was at 32 bursts. At the 1 m, but not at the 1.5 m distance, the blind performed best with continuous white noise. The overlap in time of signal and echo at 1 m for 64 bursts was 60%, but at 1.5 m 82%. Avoiding an overlap between emitted bursts and returning echoes seems important for echolocation, indicating that an acoustic gaze, analogous to in echolocating animals, may also exist in humans.
Journal: Applied Acoustics - Volume 106, May 2016, Pages 77–86