کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
770668 | 1463127 | 2013 | 15 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

The use of a 3-parameter Master Curve approach where the Weibull modulus is 4 and a minimum toughness value of 20 MPa m1/2 is now well accepted and standardised. The standard allows the use of a minimum of six specimens, tested at a single temperature, to produce the Master Curve. However, the examination of a small data set can lead to difficulties when trying to fit to this standard formula especially if the toughness is larger than 20 MPa m1/2. A small data set obtained from lower shelf testing of a ferritic pressure vessel steel is used to explore some of the issues related to the Weibull modulus and minimum toughness and how a user might try to fit such data. Finite element models are used to show that enhanced minimum toughness values larger than 20 MPa m1/2 are unlikely to have arisen from warm pre-stressing. The implications for the Master Curve of the different fitting options are also briefly explored.
► KIC tests were conducted on a small number of ferritic steel specimens.
► Numerous Weibull and normal distributions were fit to the test data.
► It is shown that the Kmin of the steel tested is probably larger than 20 MPa m1/2.
► Finite element analysis shows that the increased KIC is not due to warm-prestress.
► Implications for the Master Curve of the different fitting options is explored.
Journal: Engineering Fracture Mechanics - Volume 98, January 2013, Pages 350–364