کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
830955 1470362 2012 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Material selection using preferential ranking methods
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه سایر رشته های مهندسی مهندسی (عمومی)
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Material selection using preferential ranking methods
چکیده انگلیسی

The role of materials in the engineering design process has already been well recognized. Choice of an appropriate material for a particular product is one of the critical tasks for the designers. Designers need to identify materials with specific functionalities in order to find feasible design concepts and fulfill the product’s end requirements. There is a vast array of materials with diverse properties available to the designers to satisfy different design requirements. The large number of available materials together with the complex relationships between various selection criteria, often make the material selection process a difficult and time consuming task. A systematic and efficient approach towards material selection is necessary in order to select the best alternative for a given engineering application. This paper focuses on the application of four preference ranking-based multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods for solving a gear material selection problem. These are extended PROMETHEE II (EXPROM2), complex proportional assessment of alternatives with gray relations (COPRAS-G), ORESTE (Organization, Rangement Et Synthese De Donnes Relationnelles) and operational competitiveness rating analysis (OCRA) methods. Using these four methods, a list of all the possible choices from the best to the worst suitable materials is obtained taking into account different material selection criteria. The ranking performance of these methods is also compared with that of the past researchers.


► This paper focuses on application of EXPROM2, COPRAS-G, ORESTE and OCRA methods.
► A list of all the possible choices from the best to the worst materials is derived.
► Ranking performance of the methods is compared with that of the past researchers.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Materials & Design - Volume 35, March 2012, Pages 384–393
نویسندگان
, ,