کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
8430028 1546229 2018 54 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation versus Haploidentical Donor Stem Cell Transplantation for Favorable- and Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in First Complete Remission
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقایسه پیوند سلولهای بنیادی اتولوگ با استفاده از پیوند سلول بنیادی اهداکنندگان در بیماران مبتلا به لوسمی حاد میلوئید لثه
کلمات کلیدی
لوسمی میلوئید حاد رمی کامل پیوند سلول های بنیادی اتولوگ پیوند سلول بنیادی اهداکننده،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی تحقیقات سرطان
چکیده انگلیسی
Stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an attractive postremission treatment option for patients with intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and for some favorable-risk AML patients with additional nongenetic risk factors. Autologous SCT (auto-SCT) and haploidentical donor SCT (haplo-SCT) are the widely used alternatives in cases of a lack of a HLA-matched donor. However, limited data have been published on the direct comparison between these 2 transplant types. Based on the transplant database in our center, we conducted a retrospective study involving patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk AML in first complete remission (CR1), according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. Patients with extramedullary disease or those achieving CR by more than 2 cycles were excluded. In total, 195 patients were included in the study, 88 of whom underwent auto-SCT and 107 haplo-SCT. In the entire cohort analyses the impact of high relapse incidence in the auto-SCT group was compensated by low nonrelapse mortality (NRM), which resulted in a comparable overall survival (OS) (79.0% ± 4.6% versus 80.1% ± 5.0%, P = .769) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (66.1% ± 5.2% versus 77.4% ± 4.8%, P = .079) compared with those observed in the haplo-SCT group. However, for patients with intermediate-risk AML, NRM was similar between the groups, and haplo-SCT exhibited superior survival. In case of post-SCT relapse, patients with intermediate-risk AML showed markedly inferior 3-year OS compared with that shown by patients with favorable-risk AML (23.3% ± 9.8% versus 60.8% ± 14.3%, P = .011). In the multivariate analyses, minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by flow cytometry and gene mutation status before transplantation were independent predictors for both OS and RFS. We concluded that both auto-SCT and haplo-SCT were acceptable options for postremission treatment of patients with favorable- and intermediate-risk AML. Haplo-SCT yielded a better outcome in patients with intermediate-risk AML, but the relapse after SCT still led to a poor outcome. Clearance of MRD before SCT could improve the prognosis after transplantation.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation - Volume 24, Issue 4, April 2018, Pages 779-788
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , ,