کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
883803 | 912353 | 2012 | 13 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
The primary pro-competitive justification for multiple principals to hire a common bidding agent is efficiency. The efficiency gained by doing so increases the advantage of the common bidding agent. Almost common value auction theory predicts that an advantaged bidder is able to reduce competition by credibly enhancing the ‘winner's curse’ of disadvantaged rivals. The credible threat results in disadvantaged rivals exiting the bidding process early, leaving the advantaged bidder to purchase most, if not all, units at lower prices than when rivals have common values. The results of our empirical study of a common bidding agent are consistent with this theory.
► We estimate the impact of a common bidding agent in a repeated common value auction.
► Principals hire a common bidding agent to enhance efficiency.
► An efficiency enjoyed by only one bidder results in a competitive advantage.
► Theory predicts that an advantaged bidder wins more often at reduced prices.
► Our results are consistent with theory.
Journal: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization - Volume 81, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 61–73