کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
886112 | 912986 | 2011 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
Using book review data on Amazon.com, the authors extend current research into online consumer reviews by empirically investigating the context dependence effect in the review writing process. They find that when product quality remains constant, later reviews tend to differ from previously posted ones, and the difference is moderated by the popularity of the product, the variance of previous reviews, whether later reviews explicitly refer to previous reviews, and the age of the product and the reviews. This phenomenon can be explained by both consumer expectation and self-selection effects in review writing. The implications of this research can help practitioners understand the reviewing process and provide some guidelines for improving the objectivity of online product reviews.
Research Highlights
► Later online book reviewers tend to post ratings that differ from earlier ones.
► This can be explained by consumer expectation and self-selection in review writing.
► Unpopular books are more susceptible to the context effect of existing reviews.
► Anonymous reviewers tend to write more negative reviews.
Journal: Journal of Interactive Marketing - Volume 25, Issue 3, August 2011, Pages 123–133