Exploring industry dynamics and interactions

Within strategic technology management and innovation, often stakeholders extrapolate past industry dynamics, trends and patterns into the future. One frequently used concept is that of ‘lifecycles’ — an analogy of a sequence of stages encountered by living organisms. Lifecycle terms – such as technology, product, industry – are frequently used interchangeably and without clear definition. Within the interdisciplinary context of technology management and forecasting, this juxtaposition of dynamics can create confusion rather than simplification.This paper explores some of the dynamics typically associated with technology-based industries, illustrated with data from the early US automotive industry. A wide range of dimensions are seen to have potential to influence the path of industry development, and technology roadmapping architecture is used to present a simplified visualisation of some of these. Stakeholders need to consider the units of analysis, causality and synchronicity of relevant different dynamics, rather than isolated lifecycles.Some graphical curves represent simple aggregation of components; other dynamics have significant impact, but incur time lags, rather than being superimposed. To optimise alignment of the important dimensions within any technology development, and for future strategy decisions, understanding these interactions is critical.

► Patterns and trends are used to predict the future and reduce uncertainty.
► Lifecycles are often used, but are ill-defined and often transposed.
► This work takes a system approach using technology roadmapping (TRM) architecture.
► Interactions are possible between many different industry dynamics.
► Simplified visualisation assists investigation of synchronicity and causality.