کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
916549 | 918863 | 2013 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Mental rotation performance in primary school age children: Are there gender differences in chronometric tests? Mental rotation performance in primary school age children: Are there gender differences in chronometric tests?](/preview/png/916549.png)
In contrast to the well documented male advantage in psychometric mental rotation tests, gender differences in chronometric experimental designs are still under dispute. Therefore, a systematic investigation of gender differences in mental rotation performance in primary-school children is presented in this paper. A chronometric mental rotation task was used to test 449 second and fourth graders. The children were tested in three separate groups each with different stimulus material (animal drawings, letters, or cube figures). The results show that chronometric mental rotation tasks with cube figures – even rotated in picture plane only – were too difficult for children in both age groups. Further analyses with animal drawings and letters as stimuli revealed an overall gender difference in response time (RT) favoring males, an increasing RT with increasing angular disparity for all children, and faster RTs for fourth graders compared to second graders. This is the first study which has shown consistent gender differences in chronometric mental rotation with primary school aged children regarding reaction time and accuracy while considering appropriate stimuli.
► Second and fourth graders solve three chronometric mental-rotation tasks.
► Angular-disparity effect on RT and accuracy is confirmed for both age groups.
► Cube-figure tasks are too difficult for both ages.
► In letters tasks, boys outperform girls in both RT and accuracy.
► In animal drawing tasks boys outperform girls in RT and in accuracy at an angular disparity of 135°.
Journal: Cognitive Development - Volume 28, Issue 1, January–March 2013, Pages 51–62