کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
934676 | 1474920 | 2015 | 19 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• We analyze the ‘correction’ variety of but.
• We propose a relevance-theoretic analysis.
• We expose the problems connected to the traditional procedural approach.
• We argue for an alternative procedural treatment.
• We reconsider the pragmatic effects sustaining the procedural operation.
The current paper unveils the problems undermining the relevance-theoretic procedural view of correction-but, as it stands, in face of the fact that the specific application appears to defy inclusion in the procedural definition. On this view, the uniformity of a general account of but seems to be at risk. The paper aims to propose a more plausible relevance-driven account of correction that does not compromise the cause of a univocal treatment of but in procedural terms. To achieve this aim, it introduces a distinction in correction interpretation that has so far eluded attention in the relevant literature: descriptive and metarepresentational.
Journal: Language & Communication - Volume 45, November 2015, Pages 27–45