کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
935503 | 1475065 | 2014 | 16 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

• Gender and literacy are significant factors of s retention.
• Intrusive-s occurs with low frequency among all speakers.
• There is no correlation between rates of lexical-s use and intrusive-s use.
• Lexical and intrusive-s are attracted to following voiceless stops.
Theoretical linguistic treatments of the intrusive-s of popular Dominican Spanish (yo[s] tuve < yo tuve ‘I had’) assume the hypothesis that illiterate speakers have reanalyzed their phonologies so that lexical items no longer contain any trace of coda-s. As a consequence, illiterate speakers are said to restore an s into random syllable codas in an attempt to hypercorrect to a more elevated style. Using natural data gathered from sociolinguistic interviews with Dominicans of diverse literacy levels, we demonstrate that the phonological characterization of intrusive-s in the theoretical literature is incorrect and the hypothesis that illiterate speakers lack etymological /s/ is also shown to be flawed. Instead, the results of a quantitative analysis demonstrate that, despite high rates of s-deletion, overtly manifested s usually corresponds to etymological-s. Intrusive-s arises relatively rarely in our corpus and it appears from this data that lexical and intrusive-s might have distinct linguistic distributions and they may differ in what they mark socially.
Journal: Lingua - Volume 143, May 2014, Pages 20–35