کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
939465 1475398 2014 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
برچسب های تغذیه جلویی بسته. مقایسه توصیه های رقابتی ؟؟
کلمات کلیدی
برچسب تغذیه در جلوی بسته، ادعاهای سلامت، بهترین بدترین مقیاس
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک دانش تغذیه
چکیده انگلیسی


• We conducted a best–worst experiment to assess how nutrition labels affect choices.
• We also tested the labels' effects in the presence of nutrition and health claims.
• Respondents showed the most differentiation with Multiple Traffic Light labels.
• Respondents made similar choices with a Stars label, but not when rating healthiness.
• Health claims made less nutritious options more preferable.

Many stakeholders support introducing an interpretive front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition label, but disagree over the form it should take. In late 2012, an expert working group established by the New Zealand government recommended the adoption of an untested summary rating system: a Star label. This study used a best–worst scaling choice experiment to estimate how labels featuring the new Star rating, the Multiple Traffic Light (MTL), Daily Intake Guide (DIG), and a no-FOP control affected consumers' choice behaviours and product perceptions. Nutrient-content and health claims were included in the design. We also assessed whether respondents who used more or less information during the choice tasks differed in their selection patterns. Overall, while respondents made broadly similar choices with respect to the MTL and Star labels, the MTL format had a significantly greater impact on depressing preference as a food's nutritional profile became less healthy. Health claims increased rankings of less nutritious options, though this effect was less pronounced when the products featured an MTL. Further, respondents were best able to differentiate products' healthiness with MTL labels. The proposed summary Stars system had less effect on choice patterns than an MTL label and our findings highlight the need for policy makers to ensure that decisions to introduce FOP labels are underpinned by robust research evidence. These results suggest that the proposed summary Stars system will have less effect on shifting food choice patterns than interpretive FOP nutrition label featuring traffic light ratings.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Appetite - Volume 82, 1 November 2014, Pages 67–77
نویسندگان
, , ,