کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
959312 | 929209 | 2009 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Bridging the gap between the field and the lab: Environmental goods, policy maker input, and consequentiality
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی
اقتصاد، اقتصادسنجی و امور مالی
اقتصاد و اقتصادسنجی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Bridging the gap between the field and the lab: Environmental goods, policy maker input, and consequentiality Bridging the gap between the field and the lab: Environmental goods, policy maker input, and consequentiality](/preview/png/959312.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
This paper explores the criterion validity of stated preference methods through experimental referenda that capture key characteristics of a stated preference survey for a proposed environmental program. In particular, we investigate whether advisory referenda, where participant votes have either known or unknown weight in the policy decision, can elicit values comparable to that of a standard, incentive-compatible referendum. When participants regard their votes as consequential, our results suggest there is no elicitation bias with advisory referenda. For advisory referenda where participants view their votes as inconsequential, and for purely hypothetical referenda, we observe elicitation bias.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management - Volume 58, Issue 3, November 2009, Pages 338–345
Journal: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management - Volume 58, Issue 3, November 2009, Pages 338–345
نویسندگان
Christian A. Vossler, Mary F. Evans,