Reply to Comment on: “On the 'standard' quantum-mechanical approach to times of arrival” [Phys. Lett. A 313 (2003) 498]

The “main claim” of the Comment is “alleged paradoxes dissolve by taking seriously the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics”. In fact, the authors merely suggest possible loopholes which I argue are ineffective, not addressing the spatial nonlocality which, in retrospect, is the essence of the unusual properties under discussion.