کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
989350 | 1481033 | 2014 | 13 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• We introduce in a post-Keynesian/Kaleckian model of growth and distribution a constraint on investment.
• This constraint has consequences both in the short run and in the long run.
• In the short run it reduces capacity utilization and investment demand.
• In the long run, instead, plant utilization and capital accumulation are enhanced.
• The results apply both to the stationary equilibrium and to growth cycles.
We introduce in a post-Keynesian/Kaleckian model of growth and distribution a constraint on firms’ investment induced by increasing adjustment costs and/or limited financial resources. Whereas in the short run limiting firms’ investment reduces capacity utilization and capital accumulation, in the long run, allowing the adjustment of the “normal” to the actual degree of capacity utilization, the direction of the impact of the constraint goes in the opposite direction: relaxing the constraint reduces capital utilization and accumulation. Moreover, an increase in the saving propensity or a fall in wages do not always cause a reduction in the degree of capital utilization – the so-called paradoxes of thrift and costs – as predicted by the standard post-Keynesian/Kaleckian analysis; and growth could be profit led. These results are not confined to long-run positions of the economy characterized by convergence to a stationary equilibrium but take also into account periodic or chaotic fluctuations.
Journal: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics - Volume 28, March 2014, Pages 12–24