Nuclear energy, climate, hydricity, radiation and foolish mythologies

This article speaks to the impact of energy system mythologies on public perception and, in turn, public policy. In particular the fear of deploying nuclear power, founded largely on low-dose radiophobia, is addressed. To counter one of the most dangerous mythologies the hormesis response to low-dose radiation is explained. While countries such as China and India have largely avoided infection by the anti-nuclear-power culture, much of Europe, Japan and North America remain in thrall to the anti-nuclear ethos. A special focus is placed on the importance of using nuclear to manufacture the twin energy currencies hydrogen and electricity (hydricity) for expanding into non-electricity markets, especially transportation, and for greatly reducing anthropogenic CO2 emissions.

► Cogenerated hydricity can massively expand nuclear power markets.
► Nuclear cogenerated hydricity is essential to reverse anthropogenic CO2 emissions.
► The LNT model of biological response to radiation precludes good energy policies.
► Slavish adherence to LNT model of low-dose radiation kills thousands annually.
► Persistent nuclear mythologies preclude good healthcare and energy policies.