کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
10461184 | 923978 | 2005 | 21 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The pragmatics of sentential coordination with and
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی
علوم انسانی و هنر
زبان و زبان شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
چکیده انگلیسی
It is well known that utterances of certain and-conjunctions communicate a range of temporal and consequence relations between the states of affairs described by their conjuncts, and there are well established pragmatic accounts of how these elements of meaning arise. Our main focus in this paper is on a different set of and-conjunction utterances, which have so far received much less attention. These examples do not have a narrative function, so temporal and causal relations are not at issue. There are broadly two types of case: those that play an argumentational role and those that express an attitude of surprise/disquiet to the co-occurrence of two states of affairs. We develop a relevance-theoretic pragmatic account of the full range of interpretations and show how it is able to explain (i) the interpretive disparities between and-utterances and the corresponding cases with but, and (ii) why and may be used together with some discourse markers, such as moreover, but not with others.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Lingua - Volume 115, Issue 4, April 2005, Pages 569-589
Journal: Lingua - Volume 115, Issue 4, April 2005, Pages 569-589
نویسندگان
Diane Blakemore, Robyn Carston,