کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1048344 | 1484505 | 2013 | 18 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
In 2009, China committed to reducing its carbon dioxide intensity (CO2/unit of gross domestic product, GDP) by 40–45% by 2020 from a s2005 baseline and in March 2011, China’s 12th Five-Year Plan established a carbon intensity reduction goal of 17% between 2011 and 2015. The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) of China then established a Low Carbon City policy and announced the selection of 5 provinces and 8 cities to pilot the low carbon development work. How to determine if a city or province is “low carbon” has not been defined by the Chinese government.Macro-level indicators of low carbon development, such as energy use or CO2 emissions per unit of GDP or per capita may be too aggregated to be meaningful measurements of whether a city or province is truly “low carbon”. Instead, indicators based on energy end-use sectors (industry, residential, commercial, transport, electric power) offer a better approach for defining “low carbon” and for taking action to reduce energy-related carbon emissions.This report presents and tests a methodology for the development of a low carbon indicator system at the provincial and city level, providing initial results for an end-use low carbon indicator system, based on data available at the provincial and municipal levels. The report begins with a discussion of macro-level indicators that are typically used for inter-city, regional, or inter-country comparisons. It then turns to a discussion of the methodology used to develop a more robust low carbon indicator for China. The report presents the results of this indicator with examples for 6 selected provinces and cities in China (Beijing, Shanghai, Shanxi, Shandong, Guangdong, and Hubei). The report concludes with a discussion of data issues and other problems encountered during the development of the end-use low carbon indicator, followed by recommendations for future improvement.
► This report presents and tests a methodology for the development of a low carbon indicator system for China.
► Issues with macro-level indicators typically used for inter-city, regional, or inter-country comparisons are discussed.
► A methodology to develop a more robust low carbon indicator for China is presented.
► Results of this indicator with examples for six selected provinces and cities in China are presented.
► The report concludes with a discussion of data issues and other problems and gives recommendations for future improvement.
Journal: Habitat International - Volume 37, January 2013, Pages 4–21