کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1051736 946356 2013 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
US voter registration reform
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی علوم اجتماعی جغرافیا، برنامه ریزی و توسعه
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
US voter registration reform
چکیده انگلیسی


• EDR and top-down registries have very different effects on voters.
• Voters not voting due to registration problems declined from 2000–2008.
• Voters in EDR states are much less likely to not vote because of a registry problem.
• Top-down registries minimally effect not voting because of a registry problem.
• EDR state voters are registered at higher rates compared to those in top-down states.

Voter registration in the United States changed after the 2000 election with a requirement that states adopt statewide voter registries. However, these registries vary in design in practice, with some states having state managed “top–down” registries and other states having more decentralized “bottom–up” registries. I compare the effect of moving to a top–down registry with the adoption of Election Day registration – where voters can register to vote the day of the election – on voters saying that they are not registered because of election management problems or not voting because of a voter registration issue. EDR had a pronounced effect on reducing voter registration problems but the adoption of new voter registries had minimal effect on the same problems.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Electoral Studies - Volume 32, Issue 4, December 2013, Pages 589–596
نویسندگان
,