کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1053903 | 946733 | 2010 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Overlapping consensus versus discourse in climate change policy: The case of Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
مهندسی انرژی
انرژی های تجدید پذیر، توسعه پایدار و محیط زیست
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Overlapping consensus versus discourse in climate change policy: The case of Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund Overlapping consensus versus discourse in climate change policy: The case of Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund](/preview/png/1053903.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
Overlapping consensus is part of the broader theory “Justice as Fairness” as conceived by John Rawls. The consensus is with regard to having a socially just system. The word 'overlapping' refers to people having different reasons for supporting the system. However using overlapping consensus for investment-strategies represents an extension beyond its original intention, and moreover, removes mitigating climate change from the agenda. Removing the basis of overlapping consensus opens up scope for value-based discourse conceived by Habermas' communicative action and discourse ethics. The immense severity of climate change demands value-based and substantial arguments from powerful sovereign wealth funds, to consider the acceptability of their practice.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Environmental Science & Policy - Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2010, Pages 123-130
Journal: Environmental Science & Policy - Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2010, Pages 123-130
نویسندگان
Heidi Rapp Nilsen,