Relationship between microstructure, hardness and corrosion resistance in 20Â wt.%Cr, 27Â wt.%Cr and 36Â wt.%Cr high chromium cast irons

The microstructures, hardness and corrosion behavior of high chromium cast irons with 20, 27 and 36 wt.%Cr have been compared. The matrix in as-cast 20 wt.%Cr, 27 wt.%Cr and 36 wt.%Cr high chromium cast irons is pearlite, austenite and ferrite, respectively. The eutectic carbide in all cases is M7C3 with stoichiometry as (Cr3.37, Fe3.63)C3, (Cr4.75, Fe2.25)C3 and (Cr5.55, Fe1.45)C3, respectively. After destabilization at 1000 °C for 4 h followed by forced air cooling, the microstructure of heat-treatable 20 wt.%Cr and 27 wt.%Cr high chromium cast irons consisted of precipitated secondary carbides within a martensite matrix, with the eutectic carbides remaining unchanged. The type of the secondary carbide is M7C3 in 20 wt.%Cr iron, whereas both M23C6 and M7C3 secondary carbides are present in the 27 wt.%Cr high chromium cast iron. The size and volume fraction of the secondary carbides in 20 wt.%Cr high chromium cast iron were higher than for 27 wt.%Cr high chromium cast iron. The hardness of heat-treated 20 wt.%Cr high chromium cast iron was higher than that of heat-treated 27 wt.%Cr high chromium cast iron. Anodic polarisation tests showed that a passive film can form faster in the 27 wt.%Cr high chromium cast iron than in the 20 wt.%Cr high chromium cast iron, and the ferritic matrix in 36 wt.%Cr high chromium cast iron was the most corrosion resistant in that it exhibited a wider passive range and lower current density than the pearlitic or austenitic/martensitic matrices in 20 wt.%Cr and 27 wt.%Cr high chromium cast irons. For both the 20 wt.%Cr and the 27 wt.%Cr high chromium cast irons, destabilization heat treatment gave a slight improvement in corrosion resistance.