Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging at different magnetic field strengths: What is feasible?

Quantitative cCBV values obtained at 1.5 T and 3 T corresponded better to physiological reference values, while 7 T showed the largest deviation from expected values. Simulations of synthetic tissue voxels indicated that the discrepancy at 7 T can partly be explained by SNR issues. Results were generally more repeatable at 7 T (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.84) than at 1.5 T (ICC = 0.68) and 3 T (ICC = 0.46).