کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1074883 949964 2010 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Validation of the Modified Brief Pain Inventory-Exploratory Form in Surgery Patients
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
اعتبارسنجی از فرم پرسشنامه ـ اکتشافی اصلاح شده مختصر درد در بیماران جراحی
کلمات کلیدی
پرسشنامه مختصر درد ؛ اندازه گیری درد؛ پرسشنامه اصلاح شده مختصر درد ؛ اندازه گیری درد؛ درد پس از عمل
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی انفورماتیک سلامت
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveAn exploratory version of the Modified Brief Pain Inventory (mBPI-e) to measure acute post-operative pain, with new items on coughing, breathing, and concentration, was examined for their measurement properties.Study DesignThis is a secondary study using data from two randomized clinical trials: general surgery trial (N=1050) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery trial (N=1636). The measurements used in the two trials were: 1) mBPI-e; 2) clinician and patient global evaluations of medications; and 3) pain intensity diary. The mBPI-e and pain intensity were collected for 10 days. Clinician and patient global evaluations of medication were collected twice. The analyses conducted were: 1) exploratory factor analysis (EFA); 2) confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); 3) item response theory (IRT); 4) internal consistency; 5) test-retest reliability; 6) concurrent validity; 7) known-group validity; and 8) responsiveness.ResultsPain severity, pain interference, and coughing and breathing factors were identified. Pain severity and pain interference subscale scores were constructed for mBPI-e. IRT analyses showed all items exhibited good item characteristics. Internal consistency was 0.85 for severity and 0.87 for interference. Test-retest reliability was 0.81 for severity and 0.71 for interference. Both severity and interference scores were correlated with diary-based pain intensity ratings (P <.0001). Mean severity and interference scores varied by physician and patient global ratings (P <.05). Severity and interference scores were responsive to changes in pain diary scores and physician global ratings (P <.001). There were no substantive differences in reliability or validity for sub-samples of surgery patients.ConclusionsThe original BPI has been used in clinical studies, and the mBPI has demonstrated good reliability and validity in CABG patients. Based on this study, the mBPI-e has also demonstrated good reliability and validity for assessing postoperative acute pain in CABG and general surgery patients.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Health Outcomes Research in Medicine - Volume 1, Issue 1, July 2010, Pages e17–e28
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,