Effects of positioning optimization in an alternative computer workstation for people with and without low back pain

The aim of this study was to measure the impact of positioning optimization on typing performance and user comfort for people with and without low back pain (LBP) in alternative working postures. Participants completed a series of typing tests in each of five randomly ordered alternative working postures ranging from upright to fully supine. Typing accuracy and typing speed were recorded as were subjective measures of overall comfort and body part discomfort. The impact of positioning optimization of the monitor, keyboard, and arm supports was determined by comparing results from an “Optimized” test study protocol (n = 27) with those from a “Non-Optimized” test study protocol (n = 26). The results indicate a significant improvement in user comfort with the optimized positioning, but no significant differences in typing performance between the two test protocols. However, in both tests the slowest typing speeds occurred in the fully reclined and zero gravity working postures. Results of the user comfort scores indicated that for the Non-Optimized test, all alternative working postures were less comfortable than the upright posture. Whereas, in the Optimized test the tilted and reclined postures were comparable to the upright working posture and only the zero gravity posture was viewed as less comfortable.Relevance to industryUnderstanding the importance of position optimization for VDT operators in alternative working postures will provide valuable information toward the development of more comfortable and more accommodating computer workstations.