کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1146621 | 957521 | 2010 | 13 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: On Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian multivariate regression models with heavy-tailed errors On Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian multivariate regression models with heavy-tailed errors](/preview/png/1146621.png)
We consider Bayesian analysis of data from multivariate linear regression models whose errors have a distribution that is a scale mixture of normals. Such models are used to analyze data on financial returns, which are notoriously heavy-tailed. Let ππ denote the intractable posterior density that results when this regression model is combined with the standard non-informative prior on the unknown regression coefficients and scale matrix of the errors. Roughly speaking, the posterior is proper if and only if n≥d+kn≥d+k, where nn is the sample size, dd is the dimension of the response, and kk is number of covariates. We provide a method of making exact draws from ππ in the special case where n=d+kn=d+k, and we study Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms that can be used to explore ππ when n>d+kn>d+k. In particular, we show how the Haar PX-DA technology studied in Hobert and Marchev (2008) [11] can be used to improve upon Liu’s (1996) [7] data augmentation (DA) algorithm. Indeed, the new algorithm that we introduce is theoretically superior to the DA algorithm, yet equivalent to DA in terms of computational complexity. Moreover, we analyze the convergence rates of these MCMC algorithms in the important special case where the regression errors have a Student’s tt distribution. We prove that, under conditions on nn, dd, kk, and the degrees of freedom of the tt distribution, both algorithms converge at a geometric rate. These convergence rate results are important from a practical standpoint because geometric ergodicity guarantees the existence of central limit theorems which are essential for the calculation of valid asymptotic standard errors for MCMC based estimates.
Journal: Journal of Multivariate Analysis - Volume 101, Issue 5, May 2010, Pages 1190–1202