کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1160341 | 1490345 | 2012 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Between Cassirer and Kuhn. Some remarks on Friedman’s relativized a priori
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی
علوم انسانی و هنر
تاریخ
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Between Cassirer and Kuhn. Some remarks on Friedman’s relativized a priori Between Cassirer and Kuhn. Some remarks on Friedman’s relativized a priori](/preview/png/1160341.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
This paper provides a critical evaluation of Friedman’s arguments in favour of a relativized a priori resting on Cassirer’s Neo-Kantianism, Reichenbach’s and Carnap’s constitutive a priori, and finally Kuhn’s account of scientific paradigms change. The main objection concerns Cassirer’s own view of dynamic and historical moveable a priori categories, which Friedman seems to underestimate and recasts in a merely regulative function. However, Cassirer conception of a “liberalized” a priori can shed new light on the process of scientific change and his transcendental method may be considered as a still stimulating alternative to Kuhn’s and post-Kuhnian relativism in the philosophy of science.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A - Volume 43, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages 18–26
Journal: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A - Volume 43, Issue 1, March 2012, Pages 18–26
نویسندگان
Massimo Ferrari,