‘The happy thought of a single man’: On the legendary beginnings of a style of reasoning

In this paper I direct attention to one feature of Hacking’s recent work on styles of reasoning and argue that this feature is of far greater philosophical significance than Hacking’s limited discussion of this suggests. The feature in question is his use of ‘legendary beginnings’ in setting out a given style, viz. the method of introducing a style of reasoning by recounting a popular and quasi-mythical narrative that ties the crystallisation of that style to a particular person in a particular place and at a particular time. Whilst Hacking both deploys and discusses this method, his comments suggest that this is primarily a stylistic device employed for reasons of expedience. In contrast, it is argued here that recounting the legendary origins of a style of reasoning affords a distinctive way of vindicating that style, a vindication from within the style itself.

► The role of legendary beginnings in Ian Hacking’s work on Styles of Reasoning is examined.
► It is suggested that retelling such legends plays the role of vindicating a Style of Reason.
► This is contrasted with approaches that dismiss the use of such legends as unfortunate or inessential.