کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1160918 | 1490342 | 2012 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Styles for philosophers of science Styles for philosophers of science](/preview/png/1160918.png)
In this paper I discuss the bearing of Hacking’s ideas about Scientific Styles on traditional debates in the philosophy of science concerning rationality and realism. I argue that a kind of deflationary position with regard to realism debates is a natural consequence of Hacking’s claim that styles are self-authenticating. I then go on to argue, using an example of van Fraassen’s, that Hacking should allow a methodological role for realism debates and hence they are not idle, as he has claimed, although their resolution may not be important.
► Explores the connection between the styles project and realism/anti-realism disputes.
► Self-authenticating nature of styles provides reasons to reject some realist arguments.
► Van Fraassen’s anti-realism is untouched by these arguments.
► Argues that realism debate is not idle but plays an important heuristic role in science.
Journal: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A - Volume 43, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages 649–656