کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1800141 | 1024508 | 2012 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Fe3O4/NanoG was firstly prepared by precipitation reaction of iron oxide (Fe3O4) on the surface of graphite nanosheet (NanoG). Then composites PPy/NanoG, PPy/Fe3O4 and PPy/Fe3O4/NanoG were prepared by in-situ polymerization of the monomer pyrrole polymerized on the surface of NanoG, Fe3O4 and Fe3O4/NanoG. The structures of Fe3O4/NanoG, PPy, PPy/NanoG, PPy/Fe3O4 and PPy/Fe3O4/NanoG were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, fourier transmission infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction . Results show that NanoG and Fe3O4/NanoG are encapsulated by PPy for the layered structure and their high aspect ratio (300–500). From the thermogravimetric analysis it can be seen that the introductions of NanoG, Fe3O4 and Fe3O4/NanoG into PPy based composites lead them to exhibit better thermal stabilities than pure PPy. The measurements of electromagnetic parameters show that the reflection loss of PPy/Fe3O4/NanoG is below −15 dB at the X band (8.2–12.4 GHz) and the minimum loss value is −18.30 dB at 9.84 GHz, while the reflection loss of PPy/Fe3O4 is below −10 dB at 8.2–12.4 GHz and the minimum loss value is −14.02 dB at 10.26 GHz. The reflection loss of PPy/NanoG is below −10 dB at 8.2–12.4 GHz and the minimum loss value is −13.44 dB at 10.28 GHz. The microwave absorbing properties of PPy/Fe3O4/NanoG, PPy/Fe3O4 and PPy/NanoG are superior to that of PPy.
► Fe3O4 was chemically precipitated on the NanoG surface.
► PPy/NanoG, PPy/Fe3O4 and PPy/Fe3O4/NanoG were prepared by in-situ polymerization.
► The structures of Fe3O4/NanoG, PPy, PPy/NanoG, PPy/Fe3O4 and PPy/Fe3O4/NanoG were characterized by SEM, XRD, EDS and FTIR.
► Properties such as thermal stability, conductivity and microwave absorption were measured.
Journal: Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials - Volume 324, Issue 15, August 2012, Pages 2380–2387