کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1906416 | 1046286 | 2012 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
ObjectivesTo examine the relationship of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 with cognitive functioning in higher age, using an instrument covering multiple cognitive domains in a population-based study.DesignFollow-up study with measurement of vitamin D levels at baseline and assessment of cognitive functioning at year 5 follow-up.Setting and participantsA subgroup of 1639 participants of the ongoing epidemiological ESTHER study of the elderly general population in Saarland State, Germany, aged 65 + years at baseline (2000–2002).InterventionObservational study.MeasurementsCognitive functioning was assessed by the COGTEL phone interview developed by Kliegel et al., which was administered 5 years after ESTHER baseline. Vitamin D in baseline samples was measured by chemiluminescence methods. Additional information was obtained by standardised questionnaires.ResultsIn multiple linear regression adjusted for important confounders, women in the lowest sex-specific quintile of vitamin D showed an on average 2.1 (95% confidence interval: 0.4 to 3.9) units lower COGTEL score than women in the highest quintile. A similar, albeit slightly weaker, association was seen in males (difference of 1.7 [− 0.4 to 3.8] units). Spline regression suggested non-linearity with a distinct decline in cognitive performance in the lower range of vitamin D levels.ConclusionsOur findings support suggestions that low levels of vitamin D may be associated with reduced cognitive functioning in the elderly.
► We studied the dose–response relationship of vitamin D3 with cognitive functioning.
► Analysing 1600 participants, a very similar pattern emerged in men and women.
► Low vitamin D appeared associated with lower cognitive functioning in the elderly.
► Confounder-adjusted spline regression suggested a non-linear association.
► Future work should allow for non-linearity and also study domain-specific patterns.
Journal: Experimental Gerontology - Volume 47, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 122–127