کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2032169 | 1071685 | 2011 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

ABSTRACTPurposeTo evaluate a real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) as a tool to select candidates for coronary revascularization among patients with ESRD and to assess the rate of revascularization and mortality.Material / Methods58 ESRD patients were screened for CAD using MCE. We analyzed the rate of coronary revascularization during 3-year follow-up. Patients with and without perfusion disturbances on MCE were compared.ResultsCAD was found in 46.2% patients out of 39 who underwent coronary angiography. 11 (39.3%) patients out of 28 from the group with perfusion defects on MCE underwent revascularization procedure (21.4% - PCI, 17.9% - CABG). No one from the group without perfusion defects had revascularization procedure. Perfusion defect (OR 1.37 CI 1.37–1.86, p=0.022) was related to revascularization in multivariant analysis (OR 12.87, CI 1.86-89.21, p=0.025). There was no difference in mortality between the group which underwent invasive procedures and treated conservatively (p=0.6643). In ROC analysis defects on MCE and CAD on angiography were equally good in anticipating combined end-point (AUC 0.716, CI 95% 0.544–0.851 and AUC 0.747, CI 95% 0.577–0.875, p=0.701) and death (AUC 0.752, CI 95% 0.582–0.878 and AUC 0.729, CI 95% 0.558–0.861, p=0.805).ConclusionsOur results indicate that MCE is a safe and uncomplicated method which may help along with other methods to select candidates for coronary revascularization among ESRD patients. In our study coronary revascularization procedures were successful but they did not improve patients’ survival on 3-year follow-up.
Journal: Advances in Medical Sciences - Volume 56, Issue 2, December 2011, Pages 207–214