کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2108789 | 1083811 | 2006 | 5 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Breast biopsy and race/ethnicity among women without breast cancer Breast biopsy and race/ethnicity among women without breast cancer](/preview/png/2108789.png)
Background: Breast biopsy is essential for definitive breast cancer diagnosis, but may also play a role in determining eligibility for breast cancer preventive measures or clinical trials. In addition, the prevalence of a history of negative breast biopsy can be viewed as an indicator of the adequacy or intensity of health care in a given population. We therefore analyzed the association of a history of breast biopsy with race/ethnicity and other factors in a cohort of women without a cancer diagnosis who completed a risk assessment form for participation in the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Methods: Subjects were recruited at our large, urban teaching hospital. We developed a logistic regression model with biopsy (ever/never) as the outcome and age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and insurance coverage as the independent variables. Results: Among 805 unaffected predominantly minority subjects, white women were more than three times as likely as black and Hispanic women (OR = 3.3, 95% CI 1.9–5.9), and insured women were twice as likely as uninsured women (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.4–2.9) to have had a biopsy. Biopsy results were also associated with race/ethnicity. Discussion: We view these observations as hypothesis-generating rather than definitive. If confirmed, the associations we observed between negative biopsies and insurance status may reflect disparities in the timeliness and effectiveness of follow-up of suspicious lesions found via mammography. Our findings may also be relevant to the well-known association of breast cancer stage at diagnosis with low income and minority race/ethnicity.
Journal: Cancer Detection and Prevention - Volume 30, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 129–133