کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2138194 | 1087870 | 2007 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

We have used two strategies for treating myeloma patients aged 65–75 years. Those fit enough underwent Cyclophosphamide mobilisation and PBSCT using melphalan 200 mg/m2 (HDM) (n = 15, median 67 years). Those less fit were mobilised with G-CSF and received melphalan 70 mg/m2 (IDM) (n = 15, median 69 years). Where possible sufficient PBSC were collected so that patients not in CR after their first IDM, underwent a second IDM procedure (n = 6). The treatment was well tolerated with zero day + 100 TRM. Median cell dose was 4.85 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg and 2.7 × 106 in the HDM and IDM groups, respectively. Neutrophil engraftment was faster in the HDM group but despite this there was a trend to earlier discharge in the IDM group (13 days versus 15 days) and lower antibiotic and anti-fungal usage, suggesting better tolerability. Response rates were similar with CRs achieved in 7/15 patients receiving HDM and 9/15 receiving IDM (6 after the first and 3 after the second procedure). Three patients did not undergo a second IDM due to insufficient cells. In the IDM group 11/15 remain alive at a median follow up of 14 months with 5 in CR, whilst in the HDM group 12/15 are alive with 5 in CR at a median follow up of 15.5 m. We conclude both approaches have comparable efficacy but that IDM may be better tolerated in an older age group.
Journal: Leukemia Research - Volume 31, Issue 8, August 2007, Pages 1063–1068