کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2168712 1092911 2012 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Viability, maturation and embryo development in vitro of immature porcine and ovine oocytes vitrified in different devices
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک (عمومی)
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Viability, maturation and embryo development in vitro of immature porcine and ovine oocytes vitrified in different devices
چکیده انگلیسی

This study was designed to evaluate the effects of vitrification on immature porcine and ovine oocytes, collected at a slaughterhouse, by performing vitrification in devices with different volumes. Viability was evaluated both before and after vitrification and maturation. Immediately after warming, the percentage of viable pig oocytes was 81% regardless the type of device, while in the control (after oocyte selection) was 95%. The viability of matured pig oocytes after warming, vitrified in beveled edge open straws (BES) was 6%, in small-open-pulled-straw (SOPS) was 17% and in cryotop was 4%, while the viability of the control group was 86%. The viability and maturation results were similar with all devices. Embryo development (ED) was observed in fresh porcine oocytes with 15% 2–8 cell embryos, 7% morulae and 3% blastocysts, and non-embryo cleavage was observed in warmed oocytes. The viability of sheep oocytes immediately after warming averaged 90% in all devices, while that of the control (after oocyte selection) averaged 95%. The viability of warmed oocytes after maturation was: BES 21%, SOPS 30%, cryotop 21% and control group 86%; while maturation values were 11, 21, 34 and 70%, respectively. After vitrification, the highest ED was achieved with ovine oocytes vitrified in SOPS, with 17% morulae development and it was the only device in which blastocysts developed. A direct relationship was observed between viability and actin filament integrity in both species.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Cryobiology - Volume 64, Issue 3, June 2012, Pages 261–266
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,