کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2172187 | 1093526 | 2014 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Recovery of CD45−/Lin−/SSEA-4+ very small embryonic-like stem cells by cord blood bank standard operating procedures Recovery of CD45−/Lin−/SSEA-4+ very small embryonic-like stem cells by cord blood bank standard operating procedures](/preview/png/2172187.png)
Background aimsVery small embryonic-like (VSEL) stem cells are a rare cell population present in bone marrow, cord blood and other tissues that displays a distinct small cell size and the ability to give rise to cells of the three germ layers. VSEL stem cells were reported to be discarded in the red blood cell fraction by Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation during the processing of bone marrow and cord blood specimens. However, most cord blood banks do not include density gradient centrifugation in their procedures while red blood cells are removed by Hespan sedimentation following the Cord Blood Transplantation Study cord blood bank standard operating procedures (COBLT SOP). To clarify the retention of VSEL stem cells, we investigated the recovery of VSEL stem cells following COBLT SOP guidelines.MethodsThe recovery of CD45−/Lin−/SSEA-4+ VSEL stem cells of umbilical cord blood was examined by flow cytometry before and after COBLT SOP processing, and relative expression of pluripotent genes was analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.ResultsCD45−/Lin−/SSEA-4+ VSEL stem cells were mostly recovered in the final products following COBLT SOP guidelines. The expression of pluripotent genes could be maintained at >80% in products after hetastarch (Hespan; B. Braun Medical Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) processing.ConclusionsThe rare sub-population of CD45−/Lin−/SSEA-4+ VSEL stem cells survived after Hespan sedimentation. This finding suggests that umbilical cord blood units cryopreserved by COBLT SOP in cord blood banks should retain most VSEL stem cells present in the un-processed specimens.
Journal: Cytotherapy - Volume 16, Issue 4, April 2014, Pages 560–565