کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
227839 | 464829 | 2014 | 13 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Electrochemical properties of prepared membranes are compared.
• Dependence of rejection performance on solute/solvent interaction is examined.
• Control coefficient correlates rejection as well as hydrodynamic characteristics.
• High magnitude in loss factor is estimated in M-3 membrane denotes inferior performance.
Prepared membranes, zinc-zirconium phosphate (M-1 and M-2) and zirconium phosphate (M-3) were electrochemically characterized by membrane potential and membrane conductance measurements using aqueous sodium chloride solution of varying compositions. The data have been used for the estimation of transport number of ions and solvent in the membrane phase in addition to permselectivity and membrane fixed charge density. Membrane conductance data were used to estimate the ionic permeability and verify diffusion controlled criteria endowed with the membrane phase. Solute and co-ion permeabilities were compared and found that their values were comparable. Solute rejection of membranes was examined for limiting and intermediate cases of solute–solvent interaction in the membrane phase along with positional solute rejection. Zirconium phosphate membrane showed considerable polarization index deviation from unity indicates its minor perspective than zinc-zirconium phosphate membrane. Results show that zinc modified zirconium phosphate membranes reflected modified elastic properties than zirconium phosphate membrane. The well-known Teorell–Meyer–Sievers (TMS) theory, which describes the membrane potential for charged membranes, was considered as a frame work.
The parameter, I¨, points out that less fouling occurs in M-1 and more fouling per molar occurs in M-3.Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide
Journal: Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry - Volume 20, Issue 1, 25 January 2014, Pages 166–178