کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2427196 | 1105948 | 2012 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
We investigated maze learning in dwarf goats (Capra hircus) and the impact of lateralisation on learning. Lateralisation refers to the collection of phenomena in which external stimuli are perceived and processed differentially on the two sides of the brain and/or certain behaviours are preferentially performed by one side of the body. We trained 29 dwarf goats in a Y-maze, directing them to the opposite alley from that chosen in a free pre-run. In total, 13 goats were trained to the left alley (L-goats) and 16 goats to the right alley (R-goats). Recall of the trained alley was tested three months later. We then analysed reversal learning across 10 reversals. During training, the direction of the alley had an impact on learning. The number of runs required to reach the learning criterion was significantly lower in the L- than the R-goats. The goats recalled the trained alley three months later, with no difference between the L- and the R-goats. During the reversal learning, the reversal only tended to impact learning performance, whereas the directions of the new and the initially trained alley did not. Goats did not adopt a general rule with which to master the maze (e.g., win-stay/lose-shift) across the 10 reversals. Our results indicate a right hemisphere bias in the processing of visuospatial cues in the maze during initial training; however, no such impact was detected during reversal learning.
► Dwarf goats were trained in a Y-maze to investigate maze-learning and the impact of lateralisation on learning.
► Left alley trained goats needed less runs to learn the maze compared to right alley trained goats.
► We assume a right-hemisphere bias of processing of visuospatial cues in the maze during initial training.
► This bias was not evident anymore during reversal learning.
► Goats did not improve learning performance across ten reversals.
Journal: Behavioural Processes - Volume 89, Issue 3, March 2012, Pages 304–310