کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
243058 | 501916 | 2013 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Effects of various carbon nanofillers on the thermal conductivity and energy storage properties of paraffin-based nanocomposite phase change materials Effects of various carbon nanofillers on the thermal conductivity and energy storage properties of paraffin-based nanocomposite phase change materials](/preview/png/243058.png)
• Paraffin-based nanocomposite PCMs were prepared with various carbon nanofillers.
• The decrease in energy storage capacity of GNP-based composite was moderate.
• Phase change temperatures were slightly lowered in the presence of the nanofillers.
• Greater enhancement was achieved with decreasing the size of wire-shaped fillers.
• GNPs caused greatest thermal conductivity enhancement up to 164% at 5 wt.%.
The effects of adding various carbon nanofillers on the thermal conductivity and energy storage properties of paraffin-based nanocomposite phase change materials (PCMs) for thermal energy storage were investigated experimentally. These included short and long multi-walled carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, and graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs). For each type of the nanofillers, nanocomposite PCM samples with mass concentrations of 1–5 wt.% at an increment of 1 wt.% were prepared. The thermal conductivity of the samples in solid phase was measured using the transient hot-wire method at elevated temperatures. The energy storage properties, including melting/solidification temperatures and enthalpies, were measured using a differential scanning calorimeter. It was shown that the presence of the nanofillers slightly decreases the phase change enthalpies and has negligible influence on the phase change temperatures. The thermal conductivity of the nanocomposite PCMs was found to increase with raising the loading, while the relative enhancement strongly depends on the size and shape of the nanofillers. Of the four types of carbon nanofillers examined, GNPs were observed to cause greatest relative enhancement up to 164% at the loading of 5 wt.%, due to their two-dimensional planar structure that leads to reduced filler/matrix thermal interface resistance, in contrast to the moderately decreased energy storage capacity of GNP-based nanocomposite PCMs.
Journal: Applied Energy - Volume 110, October 2013, Pages 163–172