The effect of GnRH, eCG and progestin type on estrous synchronization following laparoscopic AI in ewes

The aim of the experiment was to evaluate the effects of GnRH and/or eCG and progestin type (implant versus CIDR) on the induction of estrus and pregnancy rate following laparoscopic AI (LAI) with frozen semen. In the first trial, ewes (n = 129) were treated with norgestomet implants for 14 days. At implant removal ewes received eCG (400 IU) and/or GnRH (25 μg) 36 h after removal, resulting in control, eCG, GnRH, and eCG/GnRH groups (n = 30–34/group). In trial 2, ewes (n = 36) were treated with intravaginal fluorogestone acetate sponges (FGA) or CIDR for 12 days. After withdrawal, half of the ewes from each progestin group received eCG (400 IU), resulting in sponge, sponge/eCG, CIDR and CIDR/eCG groups (n = 8–10/group). In both trials, estrous activity was assessed using a vasectomized ram from the time of progestin removal to laparoscopic AI with frozen semen 58–60 h (trial 1) or 54–56 h (trial 2) following cessation of treatment. In trial 1, GnRH decreased (P < 0.05) the percentage of ewes in estrus (GnRH, 75.8% versus control, 93.8% versus eCG/GnRH, 94.1%), however pregnancy rates were similar in all groups (control, 53.1%; eCG, 70.0%; GnRH, 51.5%; eCG/GnRH, 55.9%, respectively). In trial 2, neither the type of progestin nor eCG treatment effected the percentage of ewes in estrus (sponge, 75.0%; sponge/eCG, 100.0%; CIDR, 100.0%; CIDR/eCG, 90.0%). However, pregnancy rates following LAI were higher (P < 0.05) when ewes were treated with eCG (progestin + eCG, 73.7% versus progestin alone, 41.2%). Results demonstrate that the source of progestin does not influence the expression of estrus or the proportion of ewes pregnant following LAI. When progestin treatment protocols are used in combination with eCG, pregnancy rates can be increased. A dose of GnRH near the end of progestin treatment may decrease the estrous response, by inducing ovulation before normal expression of estrus.