کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2481599 1556244 2010 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
An investigation into the role of mucus thickness on mucoadhesion in the gastrointestinal tract of pig
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت داروسازی، سم شناسی و علوم دارویی اکتشاف دارویی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
An investigation into the role of mucus thickness on mucoadhesion in the gastrointestinal tract of pig
چکیده انگلیسی

Mucoadhesion in the gastrointestinal tract is a complex phenomenon and both formulation and physiological features need to be well understood and considered. Mucus thickness has been inferred to play a role in this process; however no definitive influence has been established. This study aimed to investigate the influence of mucus thickness on the mucoadhesion process, using a large animal (pig) as a model to closely resemble the human physiological features. The mucus thickness of different regions of the gastrointestinal tract of pig was fully measured by means of a histochemical method (hematoxilin/eosin) employing cryostat sections. Mucoadhesion was evaluated ex vivo on porcine mucosa by tensiometry using a polyacrylic acid polymer (Carbopol 974P NF) as a mucoadhesive model material, both in a dry and swollen state. Mucus was thickest in the stomach (body 67.9 ± 54.7 μm) and mucus thickness increased from proximal to distal segments in both the small intestine (duodenum 25.9 ± 11.8 μm, ileum 31.0 ± 15.7 μm) and large intestine (caecum 19.4 ± 8.7 μm, ascending colon 31.9 ± 17.2 μm, descending colon 35.1 ± 16.0 μm and rectum 40.8 ± 12.5 μm). Swollen polymer exhibited lower mucoadhesion than the dry form in all sections analysed. Mucus thickness plays a role on the mucoadhesion, as thicker mucus provides deeper polymer chain diffusion and entanglements; however, other factors are also involved in this complex process.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences - Volume 40, Issue 4, 11 July 2010, Pages 335–341
نویسندگان
, , , ,