کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2508765 | 1117622 | 2012 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Dealing with aggressive methadone patients in community pharmacy: A critical incident study Dealing with aggressive methadone patients in community pharmacy: A critical incident study](/preview/png/2508765.png)
BackgroundCommunity pharmacists are an important link between methadone patients and the health service in the United Kingdom. However, many pharmacists feel ill prepared to deal with methadone patients, with aggressive behavior a particular concern.ObjectiveTo assess the perceived impact of methadone patient aggression on pharmacy practice.MethodsSixteen registered pharmacists with a minimum of 3 years’ work experience were recruited from within 3 Scottish health boards. Critical incident interviews were conducted to assess pharmacist behavior during an interaction with an aggressive methadone patient.ResultsFactors considered by pharmacists to have a negative impact on an interaction with an aggressive methadone patient included intoxication of the patient, the presence of a new or an inexperienced pharmacist, and a restricted time frame for dispensing methadone. Positive factors when dealing with aggressive patients were authoritative behavior by the pharmacist, a separate dispensing area for methadone patients, or a solid counter and a positive relationship between pharmacist and patient.ConclusionAggression from methadone patients is a risk when dispensing methadone. However, action can be taken by the pharmacist to minimize the impact of that aggression on pharmacy practice. The provision of further training and support, particularly to inexperienced pharmacists, could further reduce the negative impact of patient aggression. The present study indicates that such training could be based on nontechnical skills to strengthen current leadership and teamwork behaviors.
Journal: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy - Volume 8, Issue 6, November–December 2012, Pages 542–551