کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2529255 | 1120010 | 2006 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Background:Despite the need for effective and well-tolerated lipid-lowering therapies for primary hypercholesterolemia in older patients, there is a relative paucity of published data on such treatments in this population.Objective:We conducted a post hoc analysis to examine the lipid-modifying efficacy and safety profile of simvastatin (SIMVA) monotherapy, and the coadministration of ezetimibe (EZE) and SIMVA (EZE/SIMVA) in older (ie, aged ≥65 years) versus younger (ie, aged <65 years) patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.Methods:We analyzed pooled data from 3 previously published, similarly designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. After a 6- to 8-week washout, a 4-week dietary stabilization period, and a 4-week placebo run-in period, patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of 145 to 250 mg/dL were randomized to EZE/SIMVA 10/10, 10/20, 10/40, or 10/80 mg; SIMVA 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; EZE 10 mg; or placebo for 12 weeks. In this post hoc analysis, the percent change from baseline to week 12 in LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B (apo B), triglycerides (TG), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) for EZE/SIMVA (pooled across doses) versus SIMVA alone (pooled across doses) was compared between older and younger patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Tolerability was assessed by adverse event reports and laboratory and vital signs assessments throughout the study.Results:A total of 3083 patients aged 20 to 87 years were included in the 3 studies (2320 were aged <65 years and 763 were aged ≥65 years). Baseline lipid values and patient characteristics were similar among all treatment groups for patients aged <65 years versus those aged ≥65 years except that there was a higher percentage of females (62% vs 50%) and patients with hypertension (46% vs 29%) in the older versus younger subgroup (both, P < 0.001). EZE/SIMVA was associated with greater improvements than SIMVA alone in LDL-C, non-HDL-C, apo B, TG, and hs-CRP (all, P < 0.001); these effects did not appear to differ between the older and younger sub-groups (all, P = NS). Changes in HDL-C did not differ significantly between the EZE/SIMVA and SIMVA groups. More patients receiving EZE/SIMVA than SIMVA monotherapy achieved the target LDL-C level <100 mg/dL (P < 0.001), regardless of age subgroup (77% vs 41% for patients aged <65 years and 85% vs 48% for patients aged ≥65 years). In the younger sub-group, the incidence of creatinine phosphokinase (CK) elevations ≥10× the upper limit of normal (ULN) was
Journal: Clinical Therapeutics - Volume 28, Issue 6, June 2006, Pages 849-859