کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
262992 504060 2014 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A comparative study on the effect of different strategies for energy saving of air-cooled vapor compression air conditioning systems
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
یک مطالعه مقایسه ای در مورد تاثیر استراتژی های مختلف برای صرفه جویی در انرژی سیستم های تهویه مطبوع کم فشار هوا خنک کننده هوا
کلمات کلیدی
ذخیره انرژی، مطالعه تجربی، خازن خنک کننده تبخیر، تقویت فشار مایع، سیستم های تهویه هوا فشرده سازی بخار
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی انرژی انرژی های تجدید پذیر، توسعه پایدار و محیط زیست
چکیده انگلیسی


• Combined theoretical–empirical models for performance prediction of the DX air conditioning system.
• Field tests conducted for a real building's air-cooled DX rooftop package.
• Numerical algorithm developed and implemented in transient simulation software.
• Liquid pressure amplification and evaporative-cooled condenser methods appear to be effective.
• Up to 39%, 28% and 56% energy saving for LPA, ECC and combined LPA and ECC strategies.

This paper investigates and compares the energy saving potential of air-cooled vapor compression air conditioning systems by using liquid pressure amplification (LPA), evaporative-cooled condenser (ECC) and combined LPA and ECC strategies. The applicability, limitation and energy performance of these strategies are discussed. For the purpose of this study, an existing direct expansion rooftop package of a commercial building is used for experimentation and data collection. The system under investigation is extensively equipped with a number of instrumentation devices for data logging. Theoretical–empirical mathematical models for system components were developed first, while a numerical algorithm together with monitored data and a mathematical model implemented on a transient system simulation tool is used to predict the performance of each strategy under transient loads. The integrated simulation tool was validated by comparing predicted and measured power consumption of the rooftop package. Comparing between LPA and ECC methods shows that for the ambient temperatures less than 27 °C the LPA is more effective method while for ambient temperature greater than 27 °C the ECC system is more efficient. Our results also demonstrate average energy savings of 25.3%, 18.3% and 44.2%, respectively for LPA, ECC and combined LPA and ECC methods.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Energy and Buildings - Volume 74, May 2014, Pages 163–172
نویسندگان
, , ,