|کد مقاله||کد نشریه||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||نسخه تمام متن|
|2644990||1563666||2016||8 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||دانلود رایگان|
AimsThe aims of this study were to describe spasticity trajectories as a function of time, gender, and diagnosis and to explore the correspondence between patient and clinician scores of spasticity.BackgroundDiscrepancy between examiner assessment and patient rating of spasticity exists. Assessments that include the patient perspective are critical for patient safety. This mixed-method study provided patient descriptors of spasticity integrated with clinical scales.MethodTwenty-three participants provided spasticity descriptors and rated their spasticity based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores. A clinician evaluated spasticity daily using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). This resulted in 1976 points of data for analysis.ResultsSpasticity was highly variable over time. The empirical correspondence between the clinician-rated MAS and the patient-rated NRS revealed that patient and examiner understanding of spasticity were diverged considerably.ConclusionsClinical evaluation protocols should include patient reports on spasticity. Knowledge about patient word choice can enhance patient–provider communication.
Journal: Applied Nursing Research - Volume 30, May 2016, Pages 16–23